Article Summary
Instructional coherence isn’t about control. It’s about clarity teachers shouldn’t have to invent on their own.
This post explains what instructional coherence actually looks like from a teacher’s perspective, why misalignment leads to exhaustion, and how shared frameworks and leadership design reduce decision fatigue and make teaching feel lighter instead of heavier.
- Teachers feel instructional incoherence as exhaustion.
- Misalignment shows up as shifting expectations and unclear mastery.
- Teachers compensate by building workarounds and carrying alignment mentally.
- Coherence gives teachers clarity without scripting instruction.
- Clear definitions reduce decision fatigue and system navigation.
- Teachers can’t build schoolwide coherence alone.
- Leadership design and shared frameworks make coherence sustainable.
- Instruction improves when teachers aren’t asked to hold systems together.
What Instructional Coherence Actually Looks Like in the Classroom
When instructional coherence is missing, teachers usually feel it before anyone else.
They feel it in planning meetings that don’t quite connect to what’s happening in classrooms.
They feel it when expectations shift from team to team or year to year.
They feel it when they’re asked to personalize learning inside systems that aren’t aligned or structured to support personalized learning.
Most teachers don’t describe this as a “lack of coherence.” They describe it as exhaustion, or being “teacher tired.”
Teaching is a hard job…like, a really hard job. So when we add the disconnection of instructional expectations and structures, it just gets heavy.
What Teachers Are Trying to Hold Together
In classrooms without coherence, teachers are often juggling unclear definitions of mastery, pacing expectations that conflict with student readiness, feedback practices that vary by team or grade level, and initiatives that don’t align with existing structures
So teachers do what they always do. They adapt.
They build workarounds. They translate expectations for students. They carry alignment in their heads instead of relying on systems.
That effort is rarely visible. But it’s there, it’s constant, and it’s tiring.
[scroll down to keep reading]
What Coherence Looks Like From a Teacher’s Seat
When instruction is coherent, teachers don’t lose autonomy. Rather, they gain clarity.
Instead of wondering…they know:
- how mastery is defined in their school
- what progression should look like over time
- which expectations are shared and which can flex
- how their classroom fits into a bigger learning story
That clarity doesn’t script teaching or make every classroom look and feel the same. What it actually does is reduce decision fatigue and allow teachers to spend their energy on students instead of system navigation.
Why Teachers Can’t Create Coherence Alone
The reality is, teachers are more than capable of aligning their own classrooms. And teams can align themselves within a grade level or subject matter.
But while strong instructional coherence across a school or district should be informed by experiences in the classroom, it can’t be built from the classroom up without the right support.
True instructional coherence across a school or district requires:
- shared frameworks
- aligned expectations
- consistent language
- leadership decisions that remove friction
When coherence is missing, teachers are often asked to compensate for system misalignment.
They can do it. And they will. But that’s not sustainable.
Where Leaders and Teachers Actually Meet
Instructional coherence lives at the intersection of teacher expertise and leadership design.
Shared language and frameworks help give everyone a shared structure to teach within.
When systems are aligned, teachers aren’t asked to carry coherence alone. And that’s when instruction starts to feel lighter instead of heavier.
The Shared Question Moving Forward
Instead of asking, “Are our teachers aligned?”
A better shared question is, “What parts of coherence should teachers not have to solve on their own?”
That’s where real improvement starts.
Article Recap
- Instructional incoherence drains teacher energy.
- Teachers adapt, but that effort is invisible and unsustainable.
- Coherence provides clarity without sacrificing autonomy.
- Shared frameworks and language reduce friction.
- Leadership decisions determine whether coherence exists.
- Coherence lives at the intersection of teaching and design.
- Teachers shouldn’t have to solve systemic alignment alone.
About Chad Ostrowski
Chad Ostrowski is the co-founder of the Teach Better Team, and creator of The Grid Method. He is also a co-author of the Teach Better book. But Chad is a middle school science teacher at heart. He now travels the country sharing his story, working with teachers, schools, and districts to help them to reach more students.
